Where this firm uses AI, and where it doesn't.
Some of what you read here was drafted with the help of AI. None of it was published without a lawyer reading it first. This page says which is which, because you should not have to guess.
What is written here
The articles on this site are drafted with AI and then read, corrected and approved by an attorney before anyone else can see them. Approval is not a habit somebody might skip — nothing reaches this website until a lawyer signs it off. Every statement about Washington law is checked against the statute or the rule itself rather than somebody's summary of it.
What we don't use it for
No AI gives legal advice on this site, and none decides anything about a case. It does not tell you whether you have a claim, what your case is worth, or what will happen to you. Those are answers a lawyer gives you after hearing your situation, and they are the reason the first call is free.
What happens to what you send us
Messages left through this site — the contact form, or an automated line if you reach one — are read by the firm and used to call you back. Please keep them short. Do not send the details of what happened until we have spoken and agreed to represent you.
Who is responsible
The attorney is, always. Washington's Rules of Professional Conduct apply to work done with a tool exactly as they apply to work done without one, and no tool carries any of that responsibility. If something on this site is wrong, it is the firm's mistake, not the software's — and we would like to know about it.
The duties this page reflects are set out by the Washington State Bar Association in Advisory Opinion 2025-05, on artificial-intelligence-enabled tools in law practice.
You don't have to figure this out alone.
One free conversation, no pressure, and a straight answer about where you stand.